| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsAngarocarpus G.P. Radczenko in L.L. Khalfin, 1955 †
Tungussocarpus S.V. Suchov, 1969 † · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark According to Doweld, 2002, Russian paleobotanists today use Angarocarpus in a sense differently from that originally...
Taxonomic remark According to Doweld, 2002, Russian paleobotanists today use Angarocarpus in a sense differently from that originally published, while the type of Tungussocarpus lies within Angarocarpus, making the two names synonyms. Doweld proposed to separate the genera per current usage by selecting a different type for Angarocarpus, but this proposal did not receive support from the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants (Herendeen, 2011). [details]
IRMNG (2022). Angarocarpus G.P. Radczenko in L.L. Khalfin, 1955 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1375602 on 2024-04-28
Date action by
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
additional source Doweld, A. B. (2002). (1549–1550) Proposals to conserve the names Angarocarpus and Tungussocarpus (fossil plants), the former with a conserved type. <em>Taxon.</em> 51(3): 581-582., available online at https://doi.org/10.2307/1554885 note: refer note [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2011). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants: 7. <em>Taxon.</em> 60(3): 902-905., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.603027 [details] verified source for family Doweld, A. B. (2002). (1549–1550) Proposals to conserve the names Angarocarpus and Tungussocarpus (fossil plants), the former with a conserved type. <em>Taxon.</em> 51(3): 581-582., available online at https://doi.org/10.2307/1554885 note: inferred (as per Samaropsis, original genus placement of cited included species) [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] From other sources
Descriptive info Seed; Carboniferous; Mostocki ravine, Kemerovo district, Kuznetsk basin, Russia. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark According to Doweld, 2002, Russian paleobotanists today use Angarocarpus in a sense differently from that originally published, while the type of Tungussocarpus lies within Angarocarpus, making the two names synonyms. Doweld proposed to separate the genera per current usage by selecting a different type for Angarocarpus, but this proposal did not receive support from the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants (Herendeen, 2011). [details] |
