Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Cochleare Gosse in Hudson & Gosse, 1886

1165997  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1165997)

 unaccepted (listed as unaccepted in Jersabek et al., 2018)
Genus
terrestrial
recent only
in Hudson & Gosse, Rotifera, 2
page(s): 111 [details]   
Taxonomic remark From Jersabek et al., 2018: the two described species are evidently male rotifers that cannot be allocated to any nominal...  
Taxonomic remark From Jersabek et al., 2018: the two described species are evidently male rotifers that cannot be allocated to any nominal genus. Unavailable name: not included in Rotifera List of Accepted Names (LAN) for genera. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Cochleare Gosse in Hudson & Gosse, 1886. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1165997 on 2024-04-28
Date
action
by
2009-04-13 22:00:00Z
created
2012-02-16 23:00:00Z
changed
2019-02-19 06:37:00Z
changed
2019-05-28 06:14:38Z
changed
2019-06-03 19:05:28Z
changed
2019-06-17 07:40:17Z
changed

original description in Hudson & Gosse, Rotifera, 2
page(s): 111 [details]   

basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details]   

status source Jersabek, C. D.; De Smet, W. H.; Hinz, C.; Fontaneto, D.; Hussey, C. G.; Michaloudi, E.; Wallace, R. L.; Segers, H. (2018). List of Available Names in Zoology, Candidate Part Phylum Rotifera, genus-group names established before 1 January 2000. , available online at https://archive.org/details/LANCandidatePartGeneraRotifera [details]   

name verified source Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details]   
From other sources
Taxonomic remark From Jersabek et al., 2018: the two described species are evidently male rotifers that cannot be allocated to any nominal genus. Unavailable name: not included in Rotifera List of Accepted Names (LAN) for genera. [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»