| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsThalattosuchia †
marine
fossil only
Jahresh. Ver. Naturk. Stuttgart, 57
page(s): 409 [details]
Taxonomic remark Wikipedia places the group at suborder rank "for consistency", without specifying consistency with *what*. Given the...
Taxonomic remark Wikipedia places the group at suborder rank "for consistency", without specifying consistency with *what*. Given the reluctance of modern paleontology to use Linnaean ranks at all above family, this approach seems misguided and incongruous. The group is here placed at order rank because the next higher rank given is Crocodyliformes, which includes at least one other explicitly order-level group. [details]
IRMNG (2023). Thalattosuchia †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1133943 on 2024-05-16
Date action by
original description
Jahresh. Ver. Naturk. Stuttgart, 57
page(s): 409 [details] basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details] status source Cumberlidge Fls, N.; Daniels, S. R. (2022). A new multilocus phylogeny reveals overlooked diversity in African freshwater crabs (Brachyura: Potamoidea): a major revision with new higher taxa and genera. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 194(4): 1268-1311., available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab082 [details] name verified source Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Wikipedia places the group at suborder rank "for consistency", without specifying consistency with *what*. Given the reluctance of modern paleontology to use Linnaean ranks at all above family, this approach seems misguided and incongruous. The group is here placed at order rank because the next higher rank given is Crocodyliformes, which includes at least one other explicitly order-level group. [details]
|
