| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsVekshinella A.R. Loeblich Jr. & H. Tappan, 1963 †
1200324 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1200324)
unaccepted (superfluous replacement name)
Genus
marine,
fossil only
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 76
page(s): 194 [details]
Taxonomic remark Substitute name for Ephippium Vekshina 1959, non Blume 1825. (Index Nominum Genericorum). n.n. pro Ephippium Vekshina 1959...
Taxonomic remark Substitute name for Ephippium Vekshina 1959, non Blume 1825. (Index Nominum Genericorum). n.n. pro Ephippium Vekshina 1959 (Nomen. Zool.). From Nannotax3: replacement name proposed for Ephippium, but as noted the type species is unrecognisable and Staurolithites has priority according to Perch-Nielsen 1985. Most authors have followed Perch-Nielsen (1985, p.351) in using Staurolithites since it has priority over Vekshinella and Vagalapilla, whislt Ephippium is invalid. However de Kaenel & Bergen (1996) and more recently de Kaenel et al. (2020) have argued that because thetype species of Staurolithites, S. laffittei, is poorly described the genus should be ignored. However, the species is now in fairly common use, following the usage of Burnett (1998). Given this S. laffittei cannot be ignored and needs to be included in the generic concept, hence the correct name is Staurolithites. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Vekshinella A.R. Loeblich Jr. & H. Tappan, 1963 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1200324 on 2024-05-19
Date action by 2016-11-22 09:43:47Z changed db_admin
original description
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 76
page(s): 194 [details] basis of record SN2000 unverified [details] basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details] basis of record Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] source of synonymy Young, J. R.; Bown, P. R.; Lees, J. A. (eds). Nannotax3 website. International Nannoplankton Association (2020 version). Available online at http://www.mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/. [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source SN2000 unverified [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] From other sources
Descriptive info Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian). (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Substitute name for Ephippium Vekshina 1959, non Blume 1825. (Index Nominum Genericorum). n.n. pro Ephippium Vekshina 1959 (Nomen. Zool.). From Nannotax3: replacement name proposed for Ephippium, but as noted the type species is unrecognisable and Staurolithites has priority according to Perch-Nielsen 1985. Most authors have followed Perch-Nielsen (1985, p.351) in using Staurolithites since it has priority over Vekshinella and Vagalapilla, whislt Ephippium is invalid. However de Kaenel & Bergen (1996) and more recently de Kaenel et al. (2020) have argued that because thetype species of Staurolithites, S. laffittei, is poorly described the genus should be ignored. However, the species is now in fairly common use, following the usage of Burnett (1998). Given this S. laffittei cannot be ignored and needs to be included in the generic concept, hence the correct name is Staurolithites. [details] |
