IRMNG name details
original description
Hercynia 7 page(s): 166 [details]
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
basis of record
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details]
source of synonymy
Young, J. R.; Bown, P. R.; Lees, J. A. (eds). Nannotax3 website. International Nannoplankton Association (2020 version). Available online at http://www.mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/. [details]
name verified source
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
extant flag source
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
From other sources
Descriptive info Eocene (Lutetian); France (Donzacq, Landes). (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]
Taxonomic remark Superfluous name for Glaukolithus P. Reinhardt 1964. (Index Nominum Genericorum). [details]
Taxonomic remark From Nannotax3: name proposed for a genus to include all loxolith coccoliths, based on a good description of the wall structure, irrespective of central structure (i.e. broadly equivalent to the entire Chiastozygaceae as currently recognised). The genus would have included the types of several other genera and so was superfluous. [details]
|