| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsEusigillaria M. Mercenier, 1913 †
11923365 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11923365)
unaccepted (re-use of subgenus name, not validly published?)
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Authorship as given in Index Nominum Genericorum, however Herendeen, 2015 considers this name (also Subsigillaria) as...
Taxonomic remark Authorship as given in Index Nominum Genericorum, however Herendeen, 2015 considers this name (also Subsigillaria) as subgenera of Sigillaria introduced by Weiss (year not stated) and re-used in this sense by Mercenier: "even if we accept that Mercenier was raising these subgenera in rank to genera (and it is far from clear that he was)...". Doweld's (2012) proposal to reject this name in favour of Cyclodendron (based on a synonym assertion by Jongmans, 1936) was therefore deemed unnecessary. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Eusigillaria M. Mercenier, 1913 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11923365 on 2024-09-21
Date action by
basis of record
Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details]
additional source Doweld, A. B. (2012). (2092) Proposal to conserve the name Cyclodendron against Subsigillaria and Eusigillaria (fossil Lycopodiophyta: Lepidodendropsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61(5): 1125-1126., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615028 note: as nom. rej. prop., however see Herendeen, 2015 [details] source of synonymy Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] verified source for family Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2021 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] habitat flag source Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] From other sources
Descriptive info Stem fragment; Permian; Lukuga, Tanzania. [details]Taxonomic remark Authorship as given in Index Nominum Genericorum, however Herendeen, 2015 considers this name (also Subsigillaria) as subgenera of Sigillaria introduced by Weiss (year not stated) and re-used in this sense by Mercenier: "even if we accept that Mercenier was raising these subgenera in rank to genera (and it is far from clear that he was)...". Doweld's (2012) proposal to reject this name in favour of Cyclodendron (based on a synonym assertion by Jongmans, 1936) was therefore deemed unnecessary. [details] |
