| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsArtodictis Mercerat, 1891 †
1119285 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1119285)
unaccepted (misspelling in original work)
Genus
fossil only
Revista Mus. La Plata, 2, 51 (also as Arctodictis). [details]
Taxonomic remark Nomenclator Zoologicus gives Artodictis as the correct spelling and as Arctodictis as an error, however the reverse is the...
Taxonomic remark Nomenclator Zoologicus gives Artodictis as the correct spelling and as Arctodictis as an error, however the reverse is the case, refer Marshall, 1978; the correct spelling is also given in McKenna & Bell, 1997. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Artodictis Mercerat, 1891 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1119285 on 2024-05-19
Date action by
original description
Revista Mus. La Plata, 2, 51 (also as Arctodictis). [details]
basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details] additional source McKenna, M. C.; Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York, 631 pp. note: uses correct spelling (Arctodictis) [details] source of synonymy Marshall, L. G. (1978). Evolution of the Borhyaenidae, Extinct South American Predaceous Marsupials. University of California Press, 89 pp. (University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, Vol. 117). note: lists as misspelling (lapsus) [details] name verified source Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Nomenclator Zoologicus gives Artodictis as the correct spelling and as Arctodictis as an error, however the reverse is the case, refer Marshall, 1978; the correct spelling is also given in McKenna & Bell, 1997. [details]
|
