| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsMegadendron H.G.L. Reichenbach, 1836 †
1464922 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1464922)
unaccepted > unavailable name (Not validly published)
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Not validly published. No validation by Gutbier in Geinitz & Gutbier, Verstein. Zechsteingeb. Sachsen 11: 26. 1849, nor by...
Taxonomic remark Not validly published. No validation by Gutbier in Geinitz & Gutbier, Verstein. Zechsteingeb. Sachsen 11: 26. 1849, nor by Gothan, Abh. Königl. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst. ser.2. 44: 14. 1905. (Index Nominum Genericorum). Doweld, 2013 believed that Megadendron Reichenbach was validly published and proposed Dadoxylon for conservation over Megadendron, however this proposal was rejected by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils on the grounds that Megadendron was not validly published and therefore conservation of Dadoxylon was not necessary. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Megadendron H.G.L. Reichenbach, 1836 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1464922 on 2024-04-24
Date action by
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2012 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
additional source Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2248) Proposal to conserve the name Dadoxylon with a conserved type against Megadendron (fossil Gymnospermae: Cordaitopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(6): 1347-1348., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/626.34 note: as nom. rej. prop., however see Herendeen, 2016 [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2016). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 10. <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 382-387., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.18 [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2012 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2012 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] From other sources
Nomenclatural status nomen invalidum [details]Taxonomic remark Not validly published. No validation by Gutbier in Geinitz & Gutbier, Verstein. Zechsteingeb. Sachsen 11: 26. 1849, nor by Gothan, Abh. Königl. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst. ser.2. 44: 14. 1905. (Index Nominum Genericorum). Doweld, 2013 believed that Megadendron Reichenbach was validly published and proposed Dadoxylon for conservation over Megadendron, however this proposal was rejected by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils on the grounds that Megadendron was not validly published and therefore conservation of Dadoxylon was not necessary. [details] |
