| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsTunica Ludwig, 1757
1361483 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1361483)
unaccepted
Genus
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark An illegitimate, superfluous name for Dianthus L. (GRIN). A homotypic synonym of Dianthus Linnaeus 1753 according to Index...
Taxonomic remark An illegitimate, superfluous name for Dianthus L. (GRIN). A homotypic synonym of Dianthus Linnaeus 1753 according to Index Nominum Genericorum. Madhani et al., 2018 (with type T. saxifraga Scop.) list this genus as a synonym of Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link., however that can be considered a later usage; in their text they state: "The confusion began as Haller (1742) described Tunica with the names Dianthus and Caryophyllus below it (probably as synonyms or equivalents). Without naming any species of Tunica, Ludwig (1757) applied this name beside Dianthus, making the former a synonym of the latter. Using the generic name Tunica, replacing Dianthus, was followed by Scopoli (1771) when he replaced even the type of Dianthus with a Tunica (as T. caryophyllus (L.) Scop.). Tunica was later used by several authors (e.g., Boissier, 1867) as a genus distinct from Dianthus; the genus in this usage is now treated as a synonym of Petrorhagia (for a detailed bibliography see Ball & Heywood, 1964)." This later usage is listed in Willis as a separate name instance, Tunica Mert. & Koch, the same presently followed in IRMNG. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Tunica Ludwig, 1757. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1361483 on 2024-04-23
Date action by
basis of record
Brands, S. J. (compiler). (1989-2005). Systema Naturae 2000. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2006 version). Originally available online at http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl/; for current information, refer http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/ProjectDescription.aspx . [details]
additional source Madhani, H.; Rabeler, R.; Pirani, A.; Oxelman, B.; Heubl, G.; Zarre, S. (2018). Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries. <em>Taxon.</em> 67(1): 83-112., available online at https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Untangling-phylogenetic-patterns-and-taxonomic-in-Madhani-Rabeler/79ac95ac41cec57de1d50616970472abd7d2a195 note: lists this name in the synonymy of Petrorhagia, however refer note [details] source of synonymy Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] verified source for family GRIN Taxonomy for Plants: U.S. National Plant Germplasm Resources Information Network, September 2011 version. Available online at https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomyquery.aspx. [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source GRIN Taxonomy for Plants: U.S. National Plant Germplasm Resources Information Network, September 2011 version. Available online at https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomyquery.aspx. [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark An illegitimate, superfluous name for Dianthus L. (GRIN). A homotypic synonym of Dianthus Linnaeus 1753 according to Index Nominum Genericorum. Madhani et al., 2018 (with type T. saxifraga Scop.) list this genus as a synonym of Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link., however that can be considered a later usage; in their text they state: "The confusion began as Haller (1742) described Tunica with the names Dianthus and Caryophyllus below it (probably as synonyms or equivalents). Without naming any species of Tunica, Ludwig (1757) applied this name beside Dianthus, making the former a synonym of the latter. Using the generic name Tunica, replacing Dianthus, was followed by Scopoli (1771) when he replaced even the type of Dianthus with a Tunica (as T. caryophyllus (L.) Scop.). Tunica was later used by several authors (e.g., Boissier, 1867) as a genus distinct from Dianthus; the genus in this usage is now treated as a synonym of Petrorhagia (for a detailed bibliography see Ball & Heywood, 1964)." This later usage is listed in Willis as a separate name instance, Tunica Mert. & Koch, the same presently followed in IRMNG. [details]
|
