Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG taxon details

Chrysoculter T. Nakayama, M. Yoshida, M.-H. Noël, M. Kawachi & I. Inouye, 2005

1273423  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1273423)

accepted
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Phycologia 44
page(s): 372 [details]   
Taxonomic remark WoRMS (2020 version) and AlgaeBase place this genus in Prymnesiaceae, for reasons not stated, however AlgaeBase claims that...  
Taxonomic remark WoRMS (2020 version) and AlgaeBase place this genus in Prymnesiaceae, for reasons not stated, however AlgaeBase claims that the taxonomic treatment follows Nakayama et al., who erected the new family Chrysoculteraceae for it. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Chrysoculter T. Nakayama, M. Yoshida, M.-H. Noël, M. Kawachi & I. Inouye, 2005. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1273423 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
2011-04-28 22:00:00Z
created
2011-12-31 23:00:00Z
changed
2021-02-06 18:01:49Z
changed

original description Phycologia 44
page(s): 372 [details]   

basis of record Nakayama, T.; Yoshida, M.; Noël, M.-H.; Kawachi, M.; Inouye, I. (2005). Ultrastructure and phylogenetic position of Chrysoculter rhomboideus gen. et sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae), a new flagellate haptophyte from Japanese coastal waters. Phycologia, 44 (4), 369-383, available online at https://doi.org/10.2216/0031-8884(2005)44[369:UAPPOC]2.0.CO;2 [details]   

verified source for family Edvardsen, B.; Egge, E. S.; Vaulot, D. (2016). Diversity and distribution of haptophytes revealed by environmental sequencing and metabarcoding – a review. <em>Perspectives in Phycology.</em> 3(2): 77-91., available online at https://doi.org/10.1127/pip/2016/0052 [details]   

current name source WoRMS (Mar 2013) [details]   

extant flag source original work/web search [details]   

habitat flag source original work/web search [details]   
From other sources
Taxonomic remark WoRMS (2020 version) and AlgaeBase place this genus in Prymnesiaceae, for reasons not stated, however AlgaeBase claims that the taxonomic treatment follows Nakayama et al., who erected the new family Chrysoculteraceae for it. [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»