| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsDidymosporonites M. Salard-Cheboldaeff & M.V. Locquin, 1980 †
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From Saxena et al., 2021: Type: D. saccatus Sal.-Cheb. & Locq. 1980. ... This species was described as...
Taxonomic remark From Saxena et al., 2021: Type: D. saccatus Sal.-Cheb. & Locq. 1980. ... This species was described as “Didymosporonites” saccatus which is probably an unintentional orthographical error for Didymoporisporonites. Kalgutkar & Jansonius (2000) accepted the generic name in its original orthography as validly published with a combined description, [details]
IRMNG (2022). Didymosporonites M. Salard-Cheboldaeff & M.V. Locquin, 1980 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1248780 on 2024-04-16
Date action by
basis of record
Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/
note: as fossil fungus. Authority given as Sheffy & Dilcher, 1971, in error (correct form is in Saxena et al., 2021) [details] name verified source Saxena, R. K.; Wijayawardene, N. N.; Dai, D. Q.; Hyde, K. D.; Kirk, P. M. (2021). Diversity in fossil fungal spores. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 12(1): 670-874., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/8 [details] current name source Saxena, R. K.; Wijayawardene, N. N.; Dai, D. Q.; Hyde, K. D.; Kirk, P. M. (2021). Diversity in fossil fungal spores. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 12(1): 670-874., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/8 [details] extant flag source Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark From Saxena et al., 2021: Type: D. saccatus Sal.-Cheb. & Locq. 1980. ... This species was described as “Didymosporonites” saccatus which is probably an unintentional orthographical error for Didymoporisporonites. Kalgutkar & Jansonius (2000) accepted the generic name in its original orthography as validly published with a combined description, [details]
|
