Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG taxon details

Geinitziaceae Kunzmann, 1999 †

11923380  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11923380)

accepted
Family

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Genus Geinitzia Endlicher, 1847 † accepted as Sedites H.B. Geinitz, 1842 † (unaccepted > junior objective synonym)
marine, brackish, terrestrial
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Family name may be illegitimate since it is based on Geinitzia Endlicher, a name that was proposed for conservation against...  
Taxonomic remark Family name may be illegitimate since it is based on Geinitzia Endlicher, a name that was proposed for conservation against its senior synonym Sedites Geinitz by Zijlstra et al., 2010, however this proposal was not accepted by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants, refer Herendeen, 2011. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Geinitziaceae Kunzmann, 1999 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11923380 on 2024-04-16
Date
action
by
2022-08-09 23:56:42Z
created

basis of record Kunzmann, L. (2010). Geinitzia reichenbachii (Geinitz, 1842) Hollick and Jeffrey, 1909 and Sedites rabenhorstii Geinitz, 1842 (Pinopsida; Late Cretaceous) reconsidered and redescribed. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 159(1-2): 123-140., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.006 [details]   

additional source Herendeen, P. S. (2011). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants: 7. <em>Taxon.</em> 60(3): 902-905., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.603027
note: proposal to conserve Geinitzia not supported [details]   

additional source Zijlstra, G.; Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, H.; Kunzmann, L.; Bosma, H.; Kvaček, J. (2010). (1925) Proposal to conserve the name Geinitzia with a conserved type (fossil Coniferophyta). <em>Taxon.</em> 59(1): 301-302., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.591037
note: proposal to conserve Geinitzia, however see Herendeen, 2011 [details]   

taxonomy source Kunzmann, L. (2010). Geinitzia reichenbachii (Geinitz, 1842) Hollick and Jeffrey, 1909 and Sedites rabenhorstii Geinitz, 1842 (Pinopsida; Late Cretaceous) reconsidered and redescribed. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 159(1-2): 123-140., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.006 [details]   

name verified source Kunzmann, L. (2010). Geinitzia reichenbachii (Geinitz, 1842) Hollick and Jeffrey, 1909 and Sedites rabenhorstii Geinitz, 1842 (Pinopsida; Late Cretaceous) reconsidered and redescribed. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 159(1-2): 123-140., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.006 [details]   

current name source Kunzmann, L. (2010). Geinitzia reichenbachii (Geinitz, 1842) Hollick and Jeffrey, 1909 and Sedites rabenhorstii Geinitz, 1842 (Pinopsida; Late Cretaceous) reconsidered and redescribed. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 159(1-2): 123-140., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.006 [details]   

extant flag source Kunzmann, L. (2010). Geinitzia reichenbachii (Geinitz, 1842) Hollick and Jeffrey, 1909 and Sedites rabenhorstii Geinitz, 1842 (Pinopsida; Late Cretaceous) reconsidered and redescribed. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 159(1-2): 123-140., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.006 [details]   

habitat flag source Kunzmann, L. (2010). Geinitzia reichenbachii (Geinitz, 1842) Hollick and Jeffrey, 1909 and Sedites rabenhorstii Geinitz, 1842 (Pinopsida; Late Cretaceous) reconsidered and redescribed. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 159(1-2): 123-140., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.006 [details]   
From other sources
Taxonomic remark Family name may be illegitimate since it is based on Geinitzia Endlicher, a name that was proposed for conservation against its senior synonym Sedites Geinitz by Zijlstra et al., 2010, however this proposal was not accepted by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants, refer Herendeen, 2011. [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»