| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsPeromonoletes R.A. Couper, 1953 †
11920623 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11920623)
unaccepted > misspelling
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Included in Zhang et al., 2021 alongside Peromonolites, but interpreted as a misspelling since this name does not appear in...
Taxonomic remark Included in Zhang et al., 2021 alongside Peromonolites, but interpreted as a misspelling since this name does not appear in either Index Nominum Genericorum or Palynodata, although does occur in some recent papers, typically in association with specific epithets that correctly belong to Peromonolites. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Peromonoletes R.A. Couper, 1953 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11920623 on 2024-04-19
Date action by
basis of record
Zhang, J.; Lenz, O. K.; Wang, P.; Hornung, J. (2021). The Eco-Plant model and its implication on Mesozoic dispersed sporomorphs for Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, and Gymnosperms. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 293: 104503., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2021.104503
note: in "Appendix A Uncertain [can not be linked to any specific extant or fossil plants] dispersed spores and pollen" [details] source of synonymy manual inspection/web search (AJR) [details] verified source for family Zhang, J.; Lenz, O. K.; Wang, P.; Hornung, J. (2021). The Eco-Plant model and its implication on Mesozoic dispersed sporomorphs for Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, and Gymnosperms. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 293: 104503., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2021.104503 [details] extant flag source Zhang, J.; Lenz, O. K.; Wang, P.; Hornung, J. (2021). The Eco-Plant model and its implication on Mesozoic dispersed sporomorphs for Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, and Gymnosperms. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 293: 104503., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2021.104503 [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Included in Zhang et al., 2021 alongside Peromonolites, but interpreted as a misspelling since this name does not appear in either Index Nominum Genericorum or Palynodata, although does occur in some recent papers, typically in association with specific epithets that correctly belong to Peromonolites. [details]
|
