| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsInsaspidiotus Barreda, 1901
1022322 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1022322)
unaccepted > unavailable name (invalid name (ICZN Opinion 72))
Genus
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From ScaleNet: Berreda (1901) developed a system of formula names involving adding a prefix to each generic name to...
Taxonomic remark From ScaleNet: Berreda (1901) developed a system of formula names involving adding a prefix to each generic name to indicate the group to which it belongs. These formula names have been ruled invalid by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature in opinion 72. . Ferris, 1938a, and Morrison & Morrison, 1966, consider this name to be without status. [details]
IRMNG (2025). Insaspidiotus Barreda, 1901. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1022322 on 2026-10-15
Date action by
basis of record
CoL2006/ScaleNet [details]
additional source ICZN. (1922). Opinion 72 Herrera's zoological formulae. <em>Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections.</em> 73(1): 19-22., available online at https://zenodo.org/records/16120772/files/bhlpart388603.pdf [details] additional source ScaleNet (2025 version). , available online at https://scalenet.info/ note: as syn. of Acutaspis [details] source of synonymy Manual inspection (AJR) note: per Barreda's formula (which appears to derive from that of Herrera, 1899), Insaspidiotus would be his transformation of Aspidiotus Bouché, 1833 [details] status source ScaleNet (2025 version). , available online at https://scalenet.info/ [details] extant flag source CoL2006/ScaleNet [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark From ScaleNet: Berreda (1901) developed a system of formula names involving adding a prefix to each generic name to indicate the group to which it belongs. These formula names have been ruled invalid by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature in opinion 72. . Ferris, 1938a, and Morrison & Morrison, 1966, consider this name to be without status. [details]
|
