| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG source details
Hoser, R. T. (2015). Australian agamids: Eighteen new species from the genera Amphibolurus Wagler, 1830, Lophognathus Gray, 1842, Rankinia Wells and Wellington, 1984, Diporiphora Gray, 1842, Tympanocryptis Peters, 1863, as well as three new genera and six new subgenera. Australasian Journal of Herpetology. 30: 37-64.
235098
Hoser, R. T.
2015
Australian agamids: Eighteen new species from the genera <i>Amphibolurus</i> Wagler, 1830, <i>Lophognathus</i> Gray, 1842, <i>Rankinia</i> Wells and Wellington, 1984, <i>Diporiphora</i> Gray, 1842, <i>Tympanocryptis</i> Peters, 1863, as well as three new genera and six new subgenera
Australasian Journal of Herpetology
30: 37-64
Publication
Date action by
Arenicolagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Ctenophorus Fitzinger, 1843 (original description)
Aurantiacoagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Ctenophorus Fitzinger, 1843 (original description) Chapmanagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Pseudoctenophorus Hoser, 2015 (original description) Leucomaculagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Ctenophorus Fitzinger, 1843 (original description) Melvillesaurea Hoser, 2015 (original description) Membrumvariegatagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Ctenophorus Fitzinger, 1843 (original description) Notactenophorus Hoser, 2015 (original description) Pailsagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Diporiphora Gray, 1842 (original description) Paractenophorus Hoser, 2015 (original description) Pseudoctenophorus Hoser, 2015 (original description) Turnbullagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Pseudoctenophorus Hoser, 2015 (original description) Valenagama Hoser, 2015 accepted as Ctenophorus Fitzinger, 1843 (original description) Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and ... [details] |
