| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsRickenellaceae Vizzini, 2010
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From Index Fungorum: Circumscription includes the type of a name (Repetobasidiaceae Jülich 1982) which ought to have been...
Taxonomic remark From Index Fungorum: Circumscription includes the type of a name (Repetobasidiaceae Jülich 1982) which ought to have been adopted. Editor's note: Repetobasidiaceae Jülich is, however, listed as a nom. inval. (but still with an included genus) in Hyde et al., 2024, which recognises Rickenellaceae as accepted. Not Rikenellaceae Krieg et al., 2012, a family of Bacteria. [details]
IRMNG (2025). Rickenellaceae Vizzini, 2010. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11948764 on 2025-09-17
Date action by
basis of record
Hyde, K. D. et al. (2024). The 2024 outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 15(1): 5146-6239 [19 November]., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25 [details]
additional source Index Fungorum (2025 version). , available online at https://www.indexfungorum.org/ note: as Nom. superf., Art. 52.4, refer note; listed as syn. of Repetobasidiaceae [details] taxonomy source Hyde, K. D. et al. (2024). The 2024 outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 15(1): 5146-6239 [19 November]., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25 [details] name verified source Index Fungorum (2025 version). , available online at https://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] current name source Hyde, K. D. et al. (2024). The 2024 outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 15(1): 5146-6239 [19 November]., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25 [details] extant flag source Hyde, K. D. et al. (2024). The 2024 outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 15(1): 5146-6239 [19 November]., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25 [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark From Index Fungorum: Circumscription includes the type of a name (Repetobasidiaceae Jülich 1982) which ought to have been adopted. Editor's note: Repetobasidiaceae Jülich is, however, listed as a nom. inval. (but still with an included genus) in Hyde et al., 2024, which recognises Rickenellaceae as accepted. Not Rikenellaceae Krieg et al., 2012, a family of Bacteria. [details]
|
