IRMNG name details
basis of record
Kammerer, C. F. (2023). Revision of the Scylacosauridae (Therapsida: Therocephalia). <em>Palaeontologia Africana.</em> 56: 51-87., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/10539/35700 [details]
status source
Kammerer, C. F. (2023). Revision of the Scylacosauridae (Therapsida: Therocephalia). <em>Palaeontologia Africana.</em> 56: 51-87., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/10539/35700 [details]
verified source for family
Kammerer, C. F. (2023). Revision of the Scylacosauridae (Therapsida: Therocephalia). <em>Palaeontologia Africana.</em> 56: 51-87., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/10539/35700 [details]
name verified source
Kammerer, C. F. (2023). Revision of the Scylacosauridae (Therapsida: Therocephalia). <em>Palaeontologia Africana.</em> 56: 51-87., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/10539/35700 [details]
extant flag source
Kammerer, C. F. (2023). Revision of the Scylacosauridae (Therapsida: Therocephalia). <em>Palaeontologia Africana.</em> 56: 51-87., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/10539/35700 [details]
habitat flag source
Kammerer, C. F. (2023). Revision of the Scylacosauridae (Therapsida: Therocephalia). <em>Palaeontologia Africana.</em> 56: 51-87., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/10539/35700 [details]
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark From Kammerer, 2023: Boonstra (1954a) described Blattoidealestes gracilis as a new ‘scaloposaurid’ from the Tapinocephalus Zone. At the time, Scaloposauridae encompassed a broad array of small-bodied therocephalian taxa spanning the middle Permian through Early Triassic. More recent work, however, has shown that these ‘scaloposaurids’ sensu lato represent a heterogeneous assemblage of juvenile therocephalians, rather than any kind of coherent evolutionary unit ... The presence of serrated canines indicates that SAM-PK-4321 [the holotype] is an early therocephalian, and its combination of a high tooth count (probably I6/C1/PC8) and relatively elongate snout indicates that it is a scylacosaurid rather than a lycosuchid. Based on available data, however, this specimen is specifically indeterminate (as previously noted by Huttenlocker & Smith [2017]), and should be considered a nomen dubium (Scylacosauridae indet.) [details]
|