| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsSloveniolimulus Bicknell, Žalohar, Miklavc, Celarc, Križnar & Hitij, 2019 †
marine
fossil only
Bicknell, R. D. C.; Žalohar, J.; Miklavc, P.; Celarc, B.; Križnar, M.; Hitij, T. (2019). A new limulid genus from the Strelovec Formation (Middle Triassic, Anisian) of northern Slovenia. <em>Geological Magazine.</em> 156(12): 2017-2030., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756819000323 [details]
Taxonomic remark From Lamsdell, 2020: Sloveniolimulus is known from only a single, poorly preserved specimen displaying little more than the...
Taxonomic remark From Lamsdell, 2020: Sloveniolimulus is known from only a single, poorly preserved specimen displaying little more than the outline of the animal. ... [it] can be considered at best as incertae sedis within Xiphosurida, and might even need to be classified as nomen dubium unless additional, better preserved material comes to light. [details]
IRMNG (2023). Sloveniolimulus Bicknell, Žalohar, Miklavc, Celarc, Križnar & Hitij, 2019 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11927362 on 2024-05-23
Date action by
original description
Bicknell, R. D. C.; Žalohar, J.; Miklavc, P.; Celarc, B.; Križnar, M.; Hitij, T. (2019). A new limulid genus from the Strelovec Formation (Middle Triassic, Anisian) of northern Slovenia. <em>Geological Magazine.</em> 156(12): 2017-2030., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756819000323 [details]
verified source for family Lamsdell, J. C. (2020). The phylogeny and systematics of Xiphosura. <em>PeerJ.</em> 8: e10431., available online at https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10431 note: as incertae sedis in Xiphosurida [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark From Lamsdell, 2020: Sloveniolimulus is known from only a single, poorly preserved specimen displaying little more than the outline of the animal. ... [it] can be considered at best as incertae sedis within Xiphosurida, and might even need to be classified as nomen dubium unless additional, better preserved material comes to light. [details]
|
