| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsRuzenia O. Hilber in Hilber & Hilber, 2002
11914349 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11914349)
accepted
Genus
Ruzenia O. Hilber ex A.N. Miller & Huhndorf, 2004 · unaccepted > unavailable name (Isonym)
recent only
Hilber, R.; Hilber, O. (2002). The Genus Lasiosphaeria and allied taxa. The author, Kelheim. 9 pp. ISBN 3-00-09737-6., available online at http://www.ascofrance.com/uploads/forum_file/Lasiosphaeria-2002-0001.pdf [details] Available for editors
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as invalid in Mycobank (Sep 2019), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the...
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as invalid in Mycobank (Sep 2019), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the basionym of its type species, however the latter is a correctable error according to Index Fungorum, which treats the genus as valid (a change of position since the publication of Kirk et al., 2008 "Dictionary of the Fungi"). [details]
IRMNG (2025). Ruzenia O. Hilber in Hilber & Hilber, 2002. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11914349 on 2025-04-14
Date action by
original description
Hilber, R.; Hilber, O. (2002). The Genus Lasiosphaeria and allied taxa. The author, Kelheim. 9 pp. ISBN 3-00-09737-6., available online at http://www.ascofrance.com/uploads/forum_file/Lasiosphaeria-2002-0001.pdf [details] Available for editors
basis of record Mycobank (2019 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] verified source for family Huang, S.-K.; Hyde, K. D.; Mapook, A.; Maharachchikumbura, S. S. N.; Bhat, J. D.; McKenzie, E. H. C.; Jeewon, R.; Wen, T.-C. (2021). Taxonomic studies of some often over-looked Diaporthomycetidae and Sordariomycetidae. <em>Fungal Diversity.</em> 111(1): 443-572., available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356108563 [details] name verified source Index Fungorum (2019 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] current name source Index Fungorum (2019 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] extant flag source Mycobank (2019 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] habitat flag source Mycobank (2019 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as invalid in Mycobank (Sep 2019), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the basionym of its type species, however the latter is a correctable error according to Index Fungorum, which treats the genus as valid (a change of position since the publication of Kirk et al., 2008 "Dictionary of the Fungi"). [details]
|
