IRMNG taxon details
basis of record
Parker, S.P. (ed). (1982). Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. McGraw-Hill, New York. 2 volumes. [details]
additional source
Bonato, L.; Chagas Junior, A.; Edgecombe, G. D.; Lewis, J. G. E.; Minelli, A.; Pereira, L. A.; Shelley, R. M.; Stoev, P.; Zapparoli, M. (2016). ChiloBase 2.0 - A World Catalogue of Centipedes (Chilopoda). , available online at http://chilobase.biologia.unipd.it note: as syn. of Henicopidae [details]
current name source
Shear, W. A. (2018). The centipede family Anopsobiidae new to North America, with the description of a new genus and species and notes on the Henicopidae of North America and the Anopsobiidae of the Northern Hemisphere (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 4422(2): 259-283., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4422.2.6 note: refer note [details]
extant flag source
Parker, S.P. (ed). (1982). Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. McGraw-Hill, New York. 2 volumes. [details]
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Centipedes; terrestrial (characteristics of class) (Parker) [details]
Taxonomic remark In ChiloBase (2016) as subfamily of Henicopidae, however Shear, 2018 states: In studies of Southern Hemisphere henicopids, Edgecombe and colleagues consistently considered Anopsobiinae as a subfamily of Henicopidae (Edgecombe & Giribet 2004). However, ... Faralieva, Zalesskaja & Edgecombe (2004) treated Anopsobiidae as a full family. One might say that it makes little difference if the group is recognized as a family or a subfamily, but I lean toward the former rank, since anopsobiids consistently occur in phylogenetic trees based on both morphology and molecules as the sister taxon of all other henicopoids. [details]
| |