Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG taxon details

Virgatasporites A. Combaz, 1968 †

1088045  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1088045)

accepted
Genus
Abacum M.A. Fombella, 1978 † · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Described as spore of fossil land plant (and treated as Sporae dispersae by subsequent authors), however reassigned to...  
Taxonomic remark Described as spore of fossil land plant (and treated as Sporae dispersae by subsequent authors), however reassigned to Acritarcha by Navidi-Izad et al., 2022 (no evidence for land plant origin). These aithors state: The biological affinity of these taxa [i.e., Virgatasporites and Attritasporites] remains uncertain. They are clearly spore-like microfossils, and in younger sediments they would have been identified and classified as cryptospores. However, there is so far no evidence for a biological affinity and a relationship to the embryophyte lineage. Therefore, both taxa must be classified as incertae sedis, i.e. as acritarchs, that are defined as organic-walled microfossils of unknown biological affinity. [details]
IRMNG (2025). Virgatasporites A. Combaz, 1968 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1088045 on 2025-04-15
Date
action
by
2006-09-20 22:00:00Z
created
2011-12-31 23:00:00Z
changed
2016-11-22 09:43:47Z
changed
db_admin
2022-04-01 18:45:19Z
changed
2025-01-21 17:36:03Z
changed

basis of record CoL2006/AlgaeBase [details] 

basis of record Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] 

verified source for family Navidi-Izad, N.; Benachour, H.; Kroeck, D. M.; Steemans, P.; Servais, T. (2022). <i>Virgatasporites</i> and <i>Attritasporites</i>: the oldest land plant derived spores, cryptospores or acritarchs?. <em>Botany Letters.</em> 169(4): 495-509., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2022.2113560 [details] 

name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] 

current name source Steemans, P.; Wellman, C. H. (2018). A key for the identification of cryptospores. <em>Palynology.</em> 42(4): 492-503., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2017.1411844 [details] 

extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] 

habitat flag source as per family [details] 

original description (of Abacum M.A. Fombella, 1978 †) Palinologia No. 1 (Extraordinario)
page(s): 249 [details] 
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Ordovician. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]

Taxonomic remark Described as spore of fossil land plant (and treated as Sporae dispersae by subsequent authors), however reassigned to Acritarcha by Navidi-Izad et al., 2022 (no evidence for land plant origin). These aithors state: The biological affinity of these taxa [i.e., Virgatasporites and Attritasporites] remains uncertain. They are clearly spore-like microfossils, and in younger sediments they would have been identified and classified as cryptospores. However, there is so far no evidence for a biological affinity and a relationship to the embryophyte lineage. Therefore, both taxa must be classified as incertae sedis, i.e. as acritarchs, that are defined as organic-walled microfossils of unknown biological affinity. [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»