Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Isopodichnus Bornemann, 1889 †

1012179  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1012179)

uncertain (taxonomic status unclear)
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

terrestrial
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Ichnogenus (phyllopod [brine shrimp] burrow).  
Taxonomic remark Ichnogenus (phyllopod [brine shrimp] burrow). [details]

Taxonomic remark Keighley & Pickerill, 1996 contend that Isopodichnus should not be used, and that compound specimens of Isopodichnus should...  
Taxonomic remark Keighley & Pickerill, 1996 contend that Isopodichnus should not be used, and that compound specimens of Isopodichnus should now be assigned as compound Cruziana and Rusophycus, or in some other cases as compound Cruziana and 'Diplichnites' (sensu lato). [details]
IRMNG (2025). Isopodichnus Bornemann, 1889 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1012179 on 2025-05-02
Date
action
by
2006-11-13 23:00:00Z
created
2011-12-31 23:00:00Z
changed
2025-03-15 03:44:01Z
changed

basis of record Wisshak et al., 2004 [details] 

basis of record Museum Victoria KEmu database (Oct 2006) [details] 

additional source Keighley, D. G.; Pickerill, R. K. (1996). Small <i>Cruziana</i>, <i>Rusophycus</i>, and related ichnotaxa from eastern Canada: the nomenclatural debate and systematic ichnology. <em>Ichnos.</em> 4(4): 261-285., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10420949609380136 [details] 

status source Knaust, D. (2012). Trace-Fossil Systematics. Pp. 79-101 in Trace Fossils as Indicators of Sedimentary Environments. Developments in Sedimentology, Vol. 64. , available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53813-0.00003-4 [details] 

name verified source Wisshak et al., 2004 [details] 

extant flag source extinct group [details] 
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Ichnogenus (phyllopod [brine shrimp] burrow). [details]

Taxonomic remark Keighley & Pickerill, 1996 contend that Isopodichnus should not be used, and that compound specimens of Isopodichnus should now be assigned as compound Cruziana and Rusophycus, or in some other cases as compound Cruziana and 'Diplichnites' (sensu lato). [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»