Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Laidlawserpens Hoser, 2012

1482121  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1482121)

 unaccepted
Genus
marine, brackish
recent only
Article title: A division of Central American snake genera, Coniophanes Hallowell in Cope, 1860 into six subgenera and Conophis Peters, 1860 into two genera (Serpentes: Colubridae: Dipsadinae). [details]   

Australasian Journal of Herpetology 13: -. [55-60] [details]   
Taxonomic remark As Coniophanes (Laidlawserpens). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the...  
Taxonomic remark As Coniophanes (Laidlawserpens). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile [details]
IRMNG (2021). Laidlawserpens Hoser, 2012. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1482121 on 2024-03-28
Date
action
by
2016-01-05 23:00:00Z
created

original description Article title: A division of Central American snake genera, Coniophanes Hallowell in Cope, 1860 into six subgenera and Conophis Peters, 1860 into two genera (Serpentes: Colubridae: Dipsadinae). [details]   

original description Australasian Journal of Herpetology 13: -. [55-60] [details]   

basis of record www.organismnames.com (Mar 2015) / web search [details]   

additional source As per current placement of type species [details]   

source of synonymy original publication/web search (AJR).  [details]   

extant flag source inferred from original work (title) [details]   

habitat flag source inferred from original work (title)/web search (AJR) [details]   
From other sources
Classification Animalia;Chordata;Vertebrata;Reptilia;Lepidosauria;Squamata;Serpentes;Colubridae [details]

Taxonomic remark As Coniophanes (Laidlawserpens). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»